On Aug 18, 2011, at 12:46 AM, Jonathan Lundell wrote: > On Aug 18, 2011, at 12:23 AM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > >> It is just that it is complex and Carlos is having problems. Let's >> wait we get to the bottom of those. >> The bigger question to me is why? > > If you mean: why add all those methods, then yes. > > If you mean why is it behaving that way, I think that's to be expected, per > my earlier explanation. I *think* it's right, and it fits the symptoms.
Well, maybe. I realized that I don't really know how the garbage collector is going to respond to the sequence of method swaps. But it can't be that surprising that swapping methods in a live object isn't thread-safe. > >> >> On Aug 17, 8:09 pm, pbreit <[email protected]> wrote: >>> OK, thanks. Is that a reasonable aspiration or does the current architecture >>> not really lend itself to such?
