Thank you. Which version of web2py? 1.98.2 does not know Field.lazy

2011/8/25 Massimo Di Pierro <[email protected]>

> We are moving away from this because of many problems. Try this
> instead. It is still experimental but may go into stable soon.
>
> def vfields():
>   db.define_table('item',
>     Field('unit_price','double'),
>     Field('quantity','integer'))
>   db(db.item.id>0).delete()
>
>    db.item.lazy_total_price=Field.lazy(lambda
> self:self.item.unit_price*self.item.quantity)
>
>    db.item.bulk_insert([{'unit_price':12.00, 'quantity': 15},
>     {'unit_price':10.00, 'quantity': 99},
>     {'unit_price':120.00, 'quantity': 2},])
>   res = []
>   for r in db(db.item.id>0).select():
>     res.append([r.unit_price, r.quantity, r.lazy_total_price()])
>   return dict(res=res)
>
> On Aug 25, 7:50 am, Martin Weissenboeck <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I wanted to learn more about lazy virtual fields and therefore I have
> > repeated the example from the book:
> >
> > def vfields():
> >    db.define_table('item',
> >      Field('unit_price','double'),
> >      Field('quantity','integer'))
> >
> >    db(db.item.id>0).delete()
> >
> >    class MyVirtualFields:
> >      def lazy_total_price(self):
> >        return lambda self=self: self.item.unit_price*self.item.quantity
> >
> >    db.item.virtualfields.append (MyVirtualFields())
> >
> >    db.item.bulk_insert([{'unit_price':12.00, 'quantity': 15},
> >      {'unit_price':10.00, 'quantity': 99},
> >      {'unit_price':120.00, 'quantity': 2},])
> >
> >    res = []
> >    for r in db(db.item.id>0).select():
> >      res.append([r.unit_price, r.quantity, r.lazy_total_price()])
> >    return dict(res=res)
> >
> > The expected output is:
> >   [[12.0, 15, 180.0], [10.0, 99, 990.0], [120.0, 2, 240.0]]
> >
> > But I got
> > *  [[12.0, 15, *240.0]*, [10.0, 99, *240.0*], [120.0, 2, 240.0]]*
> > *
> > *
> > *Three times the same result.
> > *
> > I have read the book and my program over and over again - but I cannot
> see
> > any error.*
> > *
> >
> > Does somebody have an idea?
> > Martin
>

Reply via email to