I used Pylons until 0.9. The 1.0 release broke my whole system. Then after that, the guys created a glued frankestein. I do not like the approach. I have a system running in Pylons 1.0 and planning the migration to web2py soon.
http://zerp.ly/rochacbruno Em 19/09/2011 03:00, "Richard B" <[email protected]> escreveu: > I think the Pyramid folks were actually joking about themselves, not > making fun of Web2Py. The Pyramid project had just recently been > created from the merger of the Pylons and BFG frameworks. Not long > before that, TurboGears had been rewritten on top of Pylons. With all > that consolidation in the recent past, the Pyramid community was > primed for the April Fool's prank announcement of another merger. It > was particularly funny because Pyramid and Web2Py are such different > kinds of frameworks. It must have caused a lot of heartburn for any > Pyramid developers who took it seriously. > > Both Web2Py and Pyramid are serious, proven, high-quality, well > managed, well documented, and useful. They take different approaches > and are best suited for different situations, so it's hard to imagine > them ever being merged, but I've considered using both of them for > different parts of a single project. > > Richard > > > On Sep 18, 1:30 pm, Triquetra <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Seehttp://web2pyramid.pylonsproject.org/ >> >> There is very little information about this on the net. The link on >> the site just points to the pylons project on github. >> >> Is this legitimate? or is this just an attempt to divert web2py >> traffic to pylons/pyramid?
