I'm interesting in it!
On 21 sep, 11:46, Manuele <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for geospatial features. > > at the moment I'm working on a plugin_openlayers and I'll be glad to > share my work ASAP :) > > Manuele > > On 21/09/2011 11:29, puercoespin wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 for geospatial features. > > > Some ideas from three books: > > > Map Scripting 101, in > >http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1593272715/ref=s9_simh_gw_p14_d5_g14... > > > It's about mapstraction (http://mapstraction.com/), the OpenSource > > javascript front end for using google, yahoo, and other map providers. > > > Python Geospatial Development, in (http://www.amazon.com/Python- > > Geospatial-Development-Erik-Westra/dp/1849511543/ref=pd_sim_b5) > > > and html5 geolocation features, as describe for example, in HTML5 > > Geolocation (http://www.amazon.com/HTML5-Geolocation-Anthony-Holdener- > > III/dp/1449304729/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1316597049&sr=8-1) > > > On 20 sep, 18:27, Massimo Di Pierro<[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> I promised somebody geospatial features. That will probably come > >> before full text search but this is a good time to look into it. > >> Should we take an approach sqlite/mysql/postgresql only or outsource > >> it to Sphinx? > > >> On Sep 20, 9:00 am, Michele Comitini<[email protected]> > >> wrote: > > >>> +1 fulltext search > >>> *Some* graph databases have already some good pythonic API. > >>> Do you think that DAL can be adapted to graphs also? Isn't the DAL > >>> too "relational oriented"? > >>> mic > >>> 2011/9/20 Vasile Ermicioi<[email protected]>: > >>>> dal supporting graph databases and fulltext search
