Thanks for the update....
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Massimo Di Pierro < massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The web2py 4th ed is almost ready. Problem is that we keep addi > features...and we need to decide on new welcome layout or we cannot > make screenshots > > The packt book is in the hands of the publisher. > > Both book shout be available berofe christmas > > On Oct 19, 2:16 pm, joseph simpson <jjs0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just checking on the current state of the Web2py online book update as > well > > as the rumored "Packt Web2py book." > > > > Any new projected release dates? > > > > Have fun, > > > > Joe > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Jim Steil <j...@qlf.com> wrote: > > > +1 for keeping in the book format. Definitely helped attract me to > Web2py. > > > > > -Jim > > > > > On 9/26/2011 10:18 PM, Andrew wrote: > > > > >> I was actually qutie impressed with the book-like docs when I first > > >> saw them. It gives the framework a polished, professional feel (I > > >> think). I say keep it, but I'm all for keeping it up to date, in line > > >> with new functionality being released in the stable version. > > > > >> I'm also hanging out for an update with all of the new features. > > > > >> On Sep 27, 3:29 pm, pbreit<pbreitenb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>> I wonder if we could benefit from docs that are more dynamic and less > > >>> book-like? I'm not totally enamored with Sphinx, though. > > > > -- > > Joe Simpson > > > > Sent From My DROID!! > -- Joe Simpson Sent From My DROID!!
