perhaps we should make a list of desired features.
On Nov 4, 9:10 am, Philip Kilner <phil.kil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/11/2011 12:39, Phyo Arkar wrote: > > > Plone itself is a beast of its own, even tho web2py is a lot easier > > than Zope and can create something that beats Plone , alot easier > > than doing it with zope, we should not try to go that way. > > There are things that Zope & Plone do with acquisition, the ZODB and its > catalog that are hugely powerful. Having said that, the reputation for a > "Z-shaped learning curve" is well deserved. > > Again, we need to define our terms - trying to beat Plone in terms of > its enterprise (that word again!) CMS features would be plain daft, and > doomed to failure with the resources available, but trying to beat Plone > in terms of agility and accessibility to developers is a task that > web2py is well positioned for. > > -- > > Regards, > > PhilK > > 'a bell is a cup...until it is struck'
