Yes, we should probably come up with a better solution.
On Monday, November 21, 2011 8:55:57 PM UTC-5, villas wrote: > > Yes, that's a good idea and it does seem to work. > On the downside, I have a huge number of fields and I think the query will > still fetch them all. Also I have to make a very long list of > field.readable = False. > So, if a better solution appears, I would be very grateful. > However, in any case, I really do appreciate your assistance. > Thank you and best regards, David >
