What do you mean by "it's not insured"? Do you refer to the sign up checks or to the lack of actual insurance provided by some insurance company?
As I see it, the sign up process is not much different than with any other budget certificate issuer. The difference is only the price. Regards On Friday, December 23, 2011 5:49:39 AM UTC+1, guruyaya wrote: > > I've used it myself, but note this certificate is not insured in any > way, and it allows a pretty weak protection, in the free edition. It > also fails to work with wget (you can add some extra params to make it > work with wget, but most people don't want this hussle). > The quiestion is, what is this certificate for? The free edition was > good eanogth to prevent errors, when being transfered to google, when > I wanted to retrieve contacts for google. I guess it's good for the > admin, or to allow secured logins. But I wouldn't use to for web > services (as I cannot trust it to work with command line clients), and > avoid it for web payments (it's not insured at all). > I have no idea if the none free edition of startssl. > > On Dec 22, 6:04 pm, Angelo Compagnucci <[email protected]> > wrote: > > This on is free and it works well > > > > http://www.startssl.com/?app=1 > > > > They make simple validation, the certificate is ready in minutes and the > > certificate is a fully featured one! > > > > I use it! > > > > 2011/12/22 Massimo Di Pierro <[email protected]> > > > > > Any advice on where to buy a chap ssl certificate? > > > > > Please advice ONLY about services you have personally used already. > > > > > Massimo > > > > -- > > Profile:http://www.gild.com/compagnucciangelo > > Register on Gild:http://www.gild.com/referral/compagnucciangelo
