I agree but it ugly but it is actually more poweful because you have access to the entire widget as opposed to only one of its components. I think we should live this one alone.
On Dec 24, 8:58 am, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree, but may be a backward compatibility issue (though I suspect usage > of the lambda option is quite rare). > > Anthony > > > > > > > > On Saturday, December 24, 2011 4:39:58 AM UTC-5, Ray (a.k.a. Iceberg) wrote: > > > Hi Massimo, > > > I just discovered the lovely formstyle=lambda ... feature. (http:// > > web2py.com/books/default/chapter/29/7?search=formstyle) > > > It saves me from the headache of css. However, it is strange that the > > value of "field_widget" parameter is a TD instance. Should it better > > be a raw widget instance? > > > Example. Right now I have to use the ugly ".comonents[0]" notation: > > > crud.settings.formstyle = lambda record_id, field_label, > > field_widget, field_comment: TR( > > field_label, DIV(field_widget.components[0], field_comment)) > > > I prefer: > > > crud.settings.formstyle = lambda record_id, field_label, > > field_widget, field_comment: TR( > > field_label, DIV(field_widget, field_comment)) > > > If you like this idea, tell me to open an issue to track its progress. > > > Regards, > > Ray
