Thanks for reporting this. The problem for IS_IN_DB(..) is now fixed in trunk. The problem may still be there for queries like db().select(....). That needs testing.
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 10:05:18 UTC-6, tsvim wrote: > > This issue seems to be related to the one that was mentioned sone time ago > about multi-tenancy and validators. I think IS IN DB should deal with this. > So unless you specify the request tenant field IS IN DB should only relate > to the specific tenant. I'll build a patch accordingly. Please notify me if > that's not the way you envision it.
