Interesting. Guess as long as the difference is negligible in a loop, shouldn't be a concern. Thanks Anthony-
On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 12:28:32 AM UTC-4, Anthony wrote: > > I do not know for sure in this case. There is an overhead in serializing >> the UL/LI. Would be nice to have some benchmarks of both. >> > > In a stripped app with no models, no layout (just the list itself in the > view), and session turned off: > > *For 3 items:* > > <li>: 5.9 ms/req > UL/LI: 5.9 ms/req > > > *For 250 items:* > > <li>: 22 ms/req > UL/LI: 13.3 ms/req > > > *For 250 items with loop/comprehension:* > > <li> in loop: 9.4 ms/req > UL with LI in comprehension: 10.5 ms/req > > > Anthony >
