Richard, I am at a loss about this. the dal does not sort, nor does the 
validator. Can you show me and example to reproduce this sorting?

On Thursday, 19 April 2012 16:14:50 UTC-5, Richard wrote:
>
>  Issue 768 <http://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/detail?id=768>: Allow 
> insert of unsorted or unordered list:reference type field values 
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Richard Vézina <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Found this 
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1867861/python-dictionary-keep-keys-values-in-same-order-as-declared
>>  on 
>> stackoverflow where the most rated post redirect here :
>> http://dev.pocoo.org/hg/sandbox/raw-file/tip/odict.py
>>
>> Notice, it will download odict.py into your computer that contain a class 
>> supposing to allow preservation of initial order in a python dict...
>>
>> I think, it could be nice to have this class added to web2py in order to 
>> allow insert into database of unordered list:reference field input...
>>
>> Since this could be slow (not in case of few value I think), it could be 
>> a choice offer to the user like : list:reference sorted or list:reference 
>> unsorted...
>>
>> What do you think??
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Richard Vézina <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Some progress...
>>>
>>> I just make a check and chosen plugin multiple select option return a 
>>> unordered list of the picked element by the user...
>>>
>>> So, now, I think that it could be nice if web2py allow some way to 
>>> determine in case of use of chosen kind of plugin to store a unordered list 
>>> in list:reference field...
>>>
>>> I think that it is near line 207 (web2py 1.99.4) gluon/sqlhtml that we 
>>> have to make change :
>>>
>>> class OptionsWidget(FormWidget):
>>>
>>>     @staticmethod
>>>     def has_options(field):
>>>         """
>>>         checks if the field has selectable options
>>>
>>>         :param field: the field needing checking
>>>         :returns: True if the field has options
>>>         """
>>>
>>>         return hasattr(field.requires, 'options')
>>>
>>>     @classmethod
>>>     def widget(cls, field, value, **attributes):
>>>         """
>>>         generates a SELECT tag, including OPTIONs (only 1 option allowed)
>>>
>>>         see also: :meth:`FormWidget.widget`
>>>         """
>>>         default = dict(value=value) # HERE!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>> I am not pretty sure actually... And I don't really know, what could be 
>>> done to keep submit multiple list order in case of plugin use...
>>>
>>> I try naively to replace 
>>>
>>> default = dict(value=value)
>>>
>>> By 
>>>
>>> defautl = value
>>>
>>> But it failed.
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Richard Vézina <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is a part of the solution I think :
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ryancramer.com/journal/entries/select_multiple/
>>>>
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Richard 
>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would know if there is a way to tell to list:reference to not order 
>>>>> the id of the reference table to keep the order in wich the user has pick 
>>>>> those element... At the same time I just thought that this concept is 
>>>>> useless except in case you use some javascript plugin like Chosen 
>>>>> Multiple 
>>>>> Select (http://harvesthq.github.com/chosen/) because, you pick the 
>>>>> element in a list and there is no way to know which element in the list 
>>>>> the 
>>>>> user has selected first.
>>>>>
>>>>> My need is to allow users to select element from an other table and 
>>>>> keep a more informative those selected thing. Like the ingredient on the 
>>>>> back panel of food box, the first ingredient more abondant than the 
>>>>> second 
>>>>> an so on.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, for now I think I am stock with a text field. I would avoid a free 
>>>>> text field because I would prefer user to always use the same name for 
>>>>> the 
>>>>> same thing, but I can't do it with text type field. What I thought is a 
>>>>> list:reference field and a button beside the field to allow allow user to 
>>>>> add missing element name in the foreign table if need without leave the 
>>>>> original form. This can be done easily with the select or add web2py 
>>>>> slice 
>>>>> : 
>>>>> http://www.web2pyslices.com/slice/show/1446/widget-select-or-add-option. 
>>>>> Thanks to the author.
>>>>>
>>>>> But, I think that keeping the order of the selected element can't be 
>>>>> done??
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for help.
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to