requested here: 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/web2py/pqdYpUbMXKQ/discussion

On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 7:10:28 PM UTC, rdodev wrote:
>
> Bruno,
>
> Yes, it would seem that the only two options right now would be to 
> implement a document type (which I'm not sure how time consuming that would 
> be), or normalize that table and extract that dictionary/document into its 
> own table -- which could be annoying since I have several tables like that. 
> Thx for input.
>
> Best,
> Ruben
>
> On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 2:03:25 PM UTC-5, rochacbruno wrote:
>>
>> This is the Mongo Adapter types definition, I see no type 'dict' maybe it 
>> needs a new type "document'.
>>
>> class MongoDBAdapter(NoSQLAdapter):
>>     uploads_in_blob = True
>>
>>     types = {
>>                 'boolean': bool,
>>                 'string': str,
>>                 'text': str,
>>                 'password': str,
>>                 'blob': str,
>>                 'upload': str,
>>                 'integer': long,
>>                 'double': float,
>>                 'date': datetime.date,
>>                 'time': datetime.time,
>>                 'datetime': datetime.datetime,
>>                 'id': long,
>>                 'reference': long,
>>                 'list:string': list,
>>                 'list:integer': list,
>>                 'list:reference': list,
>>         }
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:51 PM, rdodev <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to define a mongo table in db.py that looks something like 
>>> this:
>>>
>>> {
>>>   field1 : "super",
>>>   field2 : "super",
>>>   things = { this : "stuff", that = "stuff" },
>>>   field3 : "Give me a call"
>>> }
>>>
>>> defining fields1-3 is easy, but what's the syntax to build 'things' 
>>> which itself is a dictionary (see above)? Your help is much appreciated.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Bruno Rocha
>> [http://rochacbruno.com.br]
>>
>>
On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 7:10:28 PM UTC, rdodev wrote:
>
> Bruno,
>
> Yes, it would seem that the only two options right now would be to 
> implement a document type (which I'm not sure how time consuming that would 
> be), or normalize that table and extract that dictionary/document into its 
> own table -- which could be annoying since I have several tables like that. 
> Thx for input.
>
> Best,
> Ruben
>
> On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 2:03:25 PM UTC-5, rochacbruno wrote:
>>
>> This is the Mongo Adapter types definition, I see no type 'dict' maybe it 
>> needs a new type "document'.
>>
>> class MongoDBAdapter(NoSQLAdapter):
>>     uploads_in_blob = True
>>
>>     types = {
>>                 'boolean': bool,
>>                 'string': str,
>>                 'text': str,
>>                 'password': str,
>>                 'blob': str,
>>                 'upload': str,
>>                 'integer': long,
>>                 'double': float,
>>                 'date': datetime.date,
>>                 'time': datetime.time,
>>                 'datetime': datetime.datetime,
>>                 'id': long,
>>                 'reference': long,
>>                 'list:string': list,
>>                 'list:integer': list,
>>                 'list:reference': list,
>>         }
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:51 PM, rdodev <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to define a mongo table in db.py that looks something like 
>>> this:
>>>
>>> {
>>>   field1 : "super",
>>>   field2 : "super",
>>>   things = { this : "stuff", that = "stuff" },
>>>   field3 : "Give me a call"
>>> }
>>>
>>> defining fields1-3 is easy, but what's the syntax to build 'things' 
>>> which itself is a dictionary (see above)? Your help is much appreciated.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Bruno Rocha
>> [http://rochacbruno.com.br]
>>
>>

Reply via email to