Good reason to be busy. Anyway, if can assemble a team a people who can reproduce the problem, I can help fix it over IRC chat. Next week.
On Tuesday, 5 June 2012 14:10:22 UTC-5, mcm wrote: > > IIRC Tim is busy with is little (real) baby. I am sure he did not > forget rocket... > > mic > > 2012/6/5 Massimo Di Pierro <[email protected]>: > > I still think rocket is the best (speed and design compromise) but I am > not > > sure Tim is till maintaining it. If rocket is no longer maintained we > should > > revert to cherrypy. It supports ssl and has proved its worth. > > > > > > On Monday, 4 June 2012 18:17:57 UTC-5, pbreit wrote: > >> > >> Well that's a problem and supports my initial intuition. I'm not sure > how > >> it can be considered "production-ready" without SSL. > >> > >> > >> On Monday, June 4, 2012 1:21:10 PM UTC-7, Anthony wrote: > >>> > >>> No SSL, though. > >>> > >>> On Monday, June 4, 2012 4:12:16 PM UTC-4, pbreit wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Ordinarily I would not think much of it but it actually looks > >>>> interesting considering it is pure Python, supposedly production > ready and > >>>> "very acceptable performance". > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Monday, June 4, 2012 7:03:11 AM UTC-7, Vasile Ermicioi wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> hi, > >>>>> what do you think about waitress webserver? > >>>>> > >>>>> http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/waitress/en/latest/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > > >
