Actually not, if you don't want your designers to run pure python and sandbox their templates.
On Saturday, June 9, 2012 2:02:51 PM UTC+10, pbreit wrote: > > Using Jinja2 in Web2py seems like a very bad idea unless 1) you have lots > of content already in Jinja2 or 2) you are doing it purely as an exercise. > > > On Friday, June 8, 2012 8:18:59 PM UTC-7, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> :-) >> >> On Friday, 8 June 2012 13:04:43 UTC-5, kirpit wrote: >>> >>> Since this discussion comes as the first result of "web2py jinja2" >>> searches, there you go a simple integration: >>> >>> https://github.com/kirpit/web2jinja >>> >>> Cheers, >>> kirpit >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, January 27, 2010 1:24:53 PM UTC+11, Alexandre wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I want to replace web2py's template engine with Jinja >>>> 2<http://jinja.pocoo.org/2/>, >>>> anyone has some experience doing something similar? I'm trying to assign >>>> response._caller with a custom function, but I'm not having much success, >>>> is that the right way? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Alexandre Rosenfeld >>>> >>>> Eng Comp 06 - USP São Carlos >>>> FoG - http://fog.icmc.usp.br >>>> IM Team - AIESEC >>>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, January 27, 2010 1:24:53 PM UTC+11, Alexandre wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I want to replace web2py's template engine with Jinja >>>> 2<http://jinja.pocoo.org/2/>, >>>> anyone has some experience doing something similar? I'm trying to assign >>>> response._caller with a custom function, but I'm not having much success, >>>> is that the right way? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Alexandre Rosenfeld >>>> >>>> Eng Comp 06 - USP São Carlos >>>> FoG - http://fog.icmc.usp.br >>>> IM Team - AIESEC >>>> >>>
