> > Yah, I tried the Enter key, and a lot of other combinations of control > and/or shift + enter as well as an abracadabra (on Chrome (didn't try any > other browser)), but none of them got the list:string to represent except > as a single string field. No additional string fields magically appeared, > as hoped for.
Hmm, it works for me. What does your code look like? > I think a stronger widget is needed for this very useful construct. I use > list:string in lots of places and having a handy way of editing them is > essential. > +1 > Obviously, not being able to delete a string after entry makes any > list:string editor DOA. > Agreed, though I think if you simply delete the content of the text box, no value is submitted for it. > I will submit a formal enhancement request, if it hasn't already been done. > It probably makes sense to find a nice existing JS widget and adopt it. Anthony
