Regarding widgets, the trunk version seems to have introduced a problem.
In the past I could do this as per the book:
``
name:mywidget
``:widget
But now this fails because of the first empty line. I can work around it
with this:
``name:mywidget
``:widget
I cannot see how this could have changed, so maybe it is a problem I have
introduced into my own code, but if anyone else has widgets failing,
please try my suggestion above.
On Monday, July 16, 2012 1:26:44 AM UTC+1, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> Second. Vladyslav has done an impressive work. I still have lots of
> patches from him improving many areas. I am finding hard to keep up. ;-)
>
> I am also looking for ways to include widgets in the new wiki... Let me
> know if you have suggestions.
>
> Massimo
>
> On Sunday, 15 July 2012 17:38:58 UTC-5, villas wrote:
>>
>> I really like the new Markmin features and well done Vladyslav - I am
>> amazed by your results in such a short time!
>>
>> New Wiki is also excellent and is a much neater integration into a site.
>> I have been working quite a lot with plugin_wiki and I'm wondering whether
>> there is some way to leverage my work on widgets, or some syntax planned
>> to include a similar thing?
>>
>> Many thanks for making these improvements :)
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, July 15, 2012 5:36:19 AM UTC+1, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>>>
>>> There is lots of new stuff in trunk. We need you to test it to make sure
>>> it does not break your apps.
>>>
>>> Here I will just mention two new features:
>>>
>>> 1) Improved MARKMIN (check out the latest examples in
>>> gluon/contrib/markmin/markmin.html) including nested lists, nested
>>> blockquotes, etc. Thanks to Vladyslav for this.
>>>
>>> 2) There is a minimalist built-in WIKI. Just do:
>>>
>>> def index(): return auth.wiki()
>>>
>>> Then use appadmin to create a 'wiki_editor' group and make yourself
>>> member. Yes, that is all. It uses MARKMIN. Use @{index/slug} to insert the
>>> ling to a page by slug. Pros? Cons? Suggestions?
>>>
>>> Checking that old apps do not break is more important than checking for
>>> new features.
>>>
>>>
