If I wasn't working on a separate sizable web2py project (a social-network) then I'd build this (a CMS) with specifications similar to Mezzanine.
But hold on a month or two, and you'll see fairly similar features in my social-network + more. (not sure which open-source license to release it under, but it should be on bitbucket by the end of the week) On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Gour <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:47:56 +1000 > Alec Taylor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I still think Mezzanine with plugins would be the best style CMS to > > build with web2pyq > > We're probably leaving web2py and will try to embrace Django & > Mezzanine, but having high estimation about web2py as framework and > being sorry for not having applications like Mezzanine ready for new > users wanting decent CMS/blog functionality, I wonder what is the > problem? > > There are lot of users here and this group has generated lot of messages > (my archive shows >90K which is much more than most of the mailing list > which I follow), but I'm curious what is the reason that web2py does not > have some/more CMS/blog apps? > > Do all the users write their own (possibly commercial) CMS/blog stuff > (from the scratch) and/or web2py is simply not meant for writing such > apps...or the reason is that it's too young framework and not enough > users? > > > We did mistake trying to focus our desktop project on D language (now > moved to wxpython) which is simply 'not there yet' and do not want to > commit similar mistake with our choice of the framework, so we'd > appreciate any insight on the topic? > > > > Sincerely, > Gour > > > -- > As fire is covered by smoke, as a mirror is covered by dust, > or as the embryo is covered by the womb, the living entity is > similarly covered by different degrees of this lust. > > http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 > --
