Hmm, unless you mention what the 'better behaviour' is, it is difficult to agree as this change does result in broken content.
In any case, I also believe that 'better behaviour' should also be to try to retain compatibility with Markdown. There are now two departures from Markdown with regards header tags. The other one is this: Markmin: #Head ----> <p>head</p> Markdown: #Head ----> <h1>head</h1> Many users started using Markmin as a substitute to Markdown. In fact my company now uses both and the staff have to remember any nit-picking differences like this. Where it doesn't hurt, it would be great to harmonise the behaviour, not introduce more differences. Best regards, David On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 8:23:49 PM UTC+1, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > There is a manor change of behavior in MARKMIN. > > Before: > > ----- markmin ---- > # title > aaa > > bbb > ------ end markmin ---- > > would render as > > <h1>title<h1><p>aaa</p><p>bbbb</p> > > After: > > the same markmin would render > > <h1>title aaa</h1><p>bbbb</p> > > In other words now headers (#, ##, ###) can be continued to the next line > and need an empty new line to be separated from the first paragraph. > I think the new behavior is better and previous behavior should be > considered a bug. > > Anyway. I just wanted people to know, in case there are major objections. > > Massimo > > > --
