I'm an old scientist and engineer. I agree all of the writers in this topic. But web2py is products for prgrammer than for end-usesr or application-programmers. And there are many end-users and application-programmers and programmers are a few. In the web2py programes there is some gaps for the end-users and application-programmers to use. If there are no efforts to eliminate the gaps, all of the works in web2py will be in vain in the future. For programmers the efforts to study web2py and to program by python or other languages is same, I think.
So, We(you and I ) must have some efforts to overcome the gaps. 2012년 5월 25일 금요일 오후 12시 54분 54초 UTC+9, Andrew W 님의 말: > > There have been numerous posts on a web2py based cms, and I know there are > many solutions out there, at varying stages of development. They each > have a different focus so it is not a simple question of "which one is > best". I won't try and mention them by name. > > However, A colleague of mine was talking about Joomla and I wanted to be > able to offer some "strategy" on a comparable web2py cms. Would anyone > care to comment on which of the web2py cms' would be a contender to Joomla > ? If not now, perhaps with a roadmap for the future. > > Personally, and I've said it before, cms functionality is very important, > and I think we should highlight the cms offerings on the web2py website. > Not necessarily one, but showcase the "best of ...". For example, look > at http://www.zope.org/the-world-of-zope It mentions Plone and Silva. > Such a thing would also strenghten the adopton of web2py. Are they > production ready enough to do that ? > > Thankyou. > > Andrew W > --
