Well, that's unfortunate. I've migrated this semi-manually; I had only four 
'boolean' fields.

Other than that, the suggested fix ( 
db._adapter.types['boolean']='TINYINT(1)' ) seems to work.

On Monday, September 17, 2012 8:42:24 PM UTC-6, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> I cannot reproduce this error with your code in 2.0.9 and the lines in 
> your traceback do not correspond to the source code I have. I think you may 
> be using an older dal.py
>
> On Monday, 17 September 2012 16:43:30 UTC-5, MichaelF wrote:
>>
>> Yes; here it is:
>>
>> 1.
>> 2.
>> 3.
>> 4.
>> 5.
>> 6.
>> 7.
>> 8.
>> 9.
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "gluon/restricted.py", line 205, in restricted
>>   File "C:/Program Files 
>> (x86)/web2py/applications/NCAA_schedule/models/db.py" 
>> <http://127.0.0.1:8000/admin/default/edit/NCAA_schedule/models/db.py>, line 
>> 165, in <module>
>>   File "gluon/dal.py", line 6320, in define_table
>>   File "gluon/dal.py", line 742, in create_table
>>   File "gluon/dal.py", line 797, in migrate_table
>>   File "gluon/dal.py", line 6714, in __getitem__
>> KeyError: 'length_is_yards'
>>
>> The table definition follows:
>>
>> db.define_table('Pool',
>>                 Field('Pool_name', 'string', required=True, unique=True),
>>                 Field('Address1', 'string', length=60),
>>                 Field('Address2', 'string', length=60),
>>                 Field('City', 'string', length=60),
>>                 Field('State', 'string', length=2),
>>                 Field('Zip', 'string', length=15),
>>                 Field('Nr_lanes', 'integer', required=True),
>>                 Field('Length', 'integer', required=True),
>>                 Field('Length_is_yards', 'boolean', 
>> required=True,default=True),
>>                 Field('Has_moveable_bulkhead', 'boolean', required=True,
>>                    default=False),
>>                 format='%(Pool_name)s %(Nr_lanes)s')
>>
>> Line 165 is the last line of the statement (format=...).
>>
>> On Monday, September 17, 2012 3:15:08 PM UTC-6, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you have a traceback with more information?
>>>
>>> On Monday, 17 September 2012 14:23:56 UTC-5, MichaelF wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. However, I refer to that field with upper case in all places. 
>>>> Can you tell me where the lower case 'pending' comes from? The field name 
>>>> has always been defined as upper case, and the app has been working up 
>>>> until I made that latest change. So I went into the db and changed the 
>>>> field name to start with lower case, then changed the model file to make 
>>>> it 
>>>> lower-case 'pending'. That worked, but now the next boolean field in the 
>>>> db.py file has an upper-case/lower-case problem. The field is 
>>>> "Length_is_yards" in both the db.py file and the db, and has been that way 
>>>> for weeks, and we've been through several db migrations for the past 
>>>> several weeks (not sure about on those particular tables, though). Now I 
>>>> get the KeyError as shown above, but this time it's for field 
>>>> 'length_is_yards'. It looks to me that web2py is assuming it's lower case.
>>>>
>>>> One of my migrations last week was the "fake_migrate_all=True" type; 
>>>> don't know if that's relevant.
>>>>
>>>> Also, in the .database file the field name is Length_is_yards (leading 
>>>> "L" is capital), as is the field name in the MySQL db.
>>>>
>>>> I'm confused.
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, September 17, 2012 12:51:34 PM UTC-6, Massimo Di Pierro 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Field('Pending' <<< upper case
>>>>> ...
>>>>> <type 'exceptions.KeyError'> 'pending' <<< lower case
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, 17 September 2012 11:37:13 UTC-5, MichaelF wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did a simple import of 'copy' and that got me by that first 
>>>>>> problem. But now I have the following problem:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> db.define_table('Person_certification',
>>>>>>                 Field('Person', db.Person),
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>                 Field('Pending', 'boolean', default = False),
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I get the following error on the line that defines field 'Pending' 
>>>>>> (and this is the first 'boolean' type in the file):
>>>>>> <type 'exceptions.KeyError'> 'pending'I have not changed the 
>>>>>> underlying MySQL db yet; all the booleans are still char(1). Do I need 
>>>>>> to 
>>>>>> change them first to Tinyint(1)? I tried that; same error.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, September 17, 2012 9:21:37 AM UTC-6, MichaelF wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. What will I need to import to get it to recognize 'copy'? I run 
>>>>>>> the suggested code and get told that 'copy' does not exist. (I'm 
>>>>>>> running 
>>>>>>> 2.5; what do I conditionally import?)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. Are we doing a copy because all the adapters share the same 
>>>>>>> 'types' object?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 7, 2012 3:48:35 PM UTC-6, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On can always do:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> db=DAL('mssql://...')
>>>>>>>> db._adapter.types = copy.copy(db._adapter.types)
>>>>>>>> db._adapter.types['boolean']='TINYINT(1)'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It should work. Can you please check it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 7 August 2012 11:56:59 UTC-5, Osman Masood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> However, web2py maintains the promise of backwards compatibility. 
>>>>>>>>> One way is to have a 'tinyint_boolean' datatype for those who want to 
>>>>>>>>> use 
>>>>>>>>> tinyints as booleans. But that looks kind of messy and inelegant. 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> An alternative is this: We could add a migration script to 
>>>>>>>>> /scripts to convert all boolean data types from CHAR(1) to 
>>>>>>>>> TINYINT(1), and 
>>>>>>>>> from 'T' to 1 and 'F' to 0. Also, when a table model is called in 
>>>>>>>>> define_table(), it would check whether its boolean data types are 
>>>>>>>>> CHAR or 
>>>>>>>>> INT, and save the result somewhere (so it wouldn't have to keep 
>>>>>>>>> checking.) 
>>>>>>>>> If the server is restarted, it would once again perform this check. 
>>>>>>>>> So, a 
>>>>>>>>> user would run the migration script and simply restart the server.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:18:33 PM UTC+8, simon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have just come across this exact same issue. 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The web2py adapter converts boolean to char(1) but in MySQL the 
>>>>>>>>>> specification is that boolean is stored as tinyint with 0 and 1. So 
>>>>>>>>>> web2py 
>>>>>>>>>> adapter is incorrect. Not changing it perpetuates the mistake.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 6 March 2011 05:14:49 UTC, Kevin Ivarsen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm connecting to a legacy MySQL database (migrate=False) with a 
>>>>>>>>>>> lot 
>>>>>>>>>>> of fields declared BOOLEAN, and noticed that attempts to modify 
>>>>>>>>>>> these 
>>>>>>>>>>> fields with the DAL failed. The DAL issues a query like this: 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> UPDATE sometable SET someflag='T' WHERE ... 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> but this gets rejected by MySQL. 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Reading through dal.py, I see that the "boolean" type maps to 
>>>>>>>>>>> CHAR(1) 
>>>>>>>>>>> in MySQLAdapter, and represent() converts to "T" and "F" values. 
>>>>>>>>>>> However, the BOOLEAN type is a synonym for TINYINT(1) in MySQL, 
>>>>>>>>>>> with 
>>>>>>>>>>> values 0 or 1, according to: 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/numeric-type-overview.html 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can trivially change this behavior in dal.py for my purposes, 
>>>>>>>>>>> but it 
>>>>>>>>>>> would be interested to try to incorporate this into the main 
>>>>>>>>>>> web2py 
>>>>>>>>>>> distribution. Unfortunately, the trivial change will break 
>>>>>>>>>>> backwards 
>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility for people who are already depending on the 
>>>>>>>>>>> current 
>>>>>>>>>>> behavior. Any thoughts on how this could be done in a backwards- 
>>>>>>>>>>> compatible way, or is it too much of an edge case to worry 
>>>>>>>>>>> about? 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, 
>>>>>>>>>>> Kevin
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>

-- 



Reply via email to