Title: [217814] trunk/Source/_javascript_Core
Revision
217814
Author
[email protected]
Date
2017-06-05 19:59:54 -0700 (Mon, 05 Jun 2017)

Log Message

We don't properly parse init_expr when the opcode is an unexpected opcode
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172945

Reviewed by JF Bastien.

The bug is a simple typo. It should use the constant
`true` instead of `false` when invoking the WASM_PARSER_FAIL_IF
macro. This failure is already caught by spec tests that fail
on arm64 devices.

* wasm/WasmModuleParser.cpp:

Modified Paths

Diff

Modified: trunk/Source/_javascript_Core/ChangeLog (217813 => 217814)


--- trunk/Source/_javascript_Core/ChangeLog	2017-06-06 02:59:05 UTC (rev 217813)
+++ trunk/Source/_javascript_Core/ChangeLog	2017-06-06 02:59:54 UTC (rev 217814)
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+2017-06-05  Saam Barati  <[email protected]>
+
+        We don't properly parse init_expr when the opcode is an unexpected opcode
+        https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172945
+
+        Reviewed by JF Bastien.
+
+        The bug is a simple typo. It should use the constant
+        `true` instead of `false` when invoking the WASM_PARSER_FAIL_IF
+        macro. This failure is already caught by spec tests that fail
+        on arm64 devices.
+
+        * wasm/WasmModuleParser.cpp:
+
 2017-06-05  Keith Miller  <[email protected]>
 
         OMG tier up checks should be a patchpoint

Modified: trunk/Source/_javascript_Core/wasm/WasmModuleParser.cpp (217813 => 217814)


--- trunk/Source/_javascript_Core/wasm/WasmModuleParser.cpp	2017-06-06 02:59:05 UTC (rev 217813)
+++ trunk/Source/_javascript_Core/wasm/WasmModuleParser.cpp	2017-06-06 02:59:54 UTC (rev 217814)
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@
     }
 
     default:
-        WASM_PARSER_FAIL_IF(false, "unknown init_expr opcode ", opcode);
+        WASM_PARSER_FAIL_IF(true, "unknown init_expr opcode ", opcode);
     }
 
     uint8_t endOpcode;
_______________________________________________
webkit-changes mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-changes

Reply via email to