Branch: refs/heads/main
  Home:   https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit
  Commit: 748f060a3b77ae67930d9c71ff5c3f159ab51c9a
      
https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/commit/748f060a3b77ae67930d9c71ff5c3f159ab51c9a
  Author: Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]>
  Date:   2026-07-03 (Fri, 03 Jul 2026)

  Changed paths:
    M 
LayoutTests/fast/selectors/nth-last-child-cannot-match-during-parsing-1-expected.txt
    M 
LayoutTests/fast/selectors/nth-last-child-cannot-match-during-parsing-1.html
    M 
LayoutTests/fast/selectors/nth-last-child-of-cannot-match-during-parsing-1-expected.txt
    M 
LayoutTests/fast/selectors/nth-last-child-of-cannot-match-during-parsing-1.html
    A 
LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/selectors/child-indexed-during-parse-expected.txt
    A 
LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/selectors/child-indexed-during-parse.html
    M Source/WebCore/css/SelectorChecker.cpp
    M Source/WebCore/cssjit/SelectorCompiler.cpp

  Log Message:
  -----------
  :last-child and friends should not gate on parser state outside style 
resolution
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315904

Reviewed by Antti Koivisto.

SelectorChecker and the selector JIT forced :last-child, :last-of-type,
:only-child, :only-of-type, :nth-last-child, and :nth-last-of-type to
return false whenever the candidate's parent had not yet finished
parsing children. While matching Chromium as an optimization for
style-resolution, it does not for querySelector().

This is the real reason a subtest in
imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/shadow-dom/untriaged/shadow-trees/upper-boundary-encapsulation/test-009.html
fails. Bug 315847 also addresses it by fixing a different bug, but does
not fix the root cause.

Test: 
imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/selectors/child-indexed-during-parse.html

Upstream: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/60294
Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/316495@main



To unsubscribe from these emails, change your notification settings at 
https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/settings/notifications

Reply via email to