Title: [133588] trunk/LayoutTests
Revision
133588
Author
[email protected]
Date
2012-11-06 04:56:57 -0800 (Tue, 06 Nov 2012)

Log Message

[EFL] Exclude fast/css/style-scoped cases from layout test running
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101326

Unreviewed, EFL gardening.

According to BUG 49142, html5 style scoped attribute implementation is on progress.
Therefore, we can skip its test cases from regular layout test running.

Patch by Kangil Han <[email protected]> on 2012-11-06

* platform/efl/TestExpectations:

Modified Paths

Diff

Modified: trunk/LayoutTests/ChangeLog (133587 => 133588)


--- trunk/LayoutTests/ChangeLog	2012-11-06 12:35:19 UTC (rev 133587)
+++ trunk/LayoutTests/ChangeLog	2012-11-06 12:56:57 UTC (rev 133588)
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+2012-11-06  Kangil Han  <[email protected]>
+
+        [EFL] Exclude fast/css/style-scoped cases from layout test running
+        https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101326
+
+        Unreviewed, EFL gardening.
+
+        According to BUG 49142, html5 style scoped attribute implementation is on progress.
+        Therefore, we can skip its test cases from regular layout test running.
+
+        * platform/efl/TestExpectations:
+
 2012-11-06  Peter Beverloo  <[email protected]>
 
         [Chromium] There shouldn't be linting errors about our TestExpectation files

Modified: trunk/LayoutTests/platform/efl/TestExpectations (133587 => 133588)


--- trunk/LayoutTests/platform/efl/TestExpectations	2012-11-06 12:35:19 UTC (rev 133587)
+++ trunk/LayoutTests/platform/efl/TestExpectations	2012-11-06 12:56:57 UTC (rev 133588)
@@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@
 
 webkit.org/b/65536 fast/css/text-rendering.html [ Missing Failure ]
 
-webkit.org/b/49142 fast/css/style-scoped [ Failure ]
+webkit.org/b/49142 fast/css/style-scoped [ Skip ]
 
 # ENABLE(INPUT_TYPE_*) are not enabled.
 webkit.org/b/29359 fast/css/pseudo-in-range.html [ Failure ]
_______________________________________________
webkit-changes mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-changes

Reply via email to