Title: [138524] trunk/LayoutTests
Revision
138524
Author
[email protected]
Date
2012-12-28 00:00:58 -0800 (Fri, 28 Dec 2012)

Log Message

instance-of-immediates.js : the word "passing" is spelled incorrectly
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105669

Patch by Stuart Eichert <[email protected]> on 2012-12-27
Reviewed by Julien Chaffraix.

Corrected spelling of the word "passing" in instance-of-immediates.js

* fast/js/script-tests/instance-of-immediates.js:

Modified Paths

Diff

Modified: trunk/LayoutTests/ChangeLog (138523 => 138524)


--- trunk/LayoutTests/ChangeLog	2012-12-28 07:44:35 UTC (rev 138523)
+++ trunk/LayoutTests/ChangeLog	2012-12-28 08:00:58 UTC (rev 138524)
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+2012-12-27  Stuart Eichert  <[email protected]>
+
+        instance-of-immediates.js : the word "passing" is spelled incorrectly
+        https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105669
+
+        Reviewed by Julien Chaffraix.
+
+        Corrected spelling of the word "passing" in instance-of-immediates.js
+
+        * fast/js/script-tests/instance-of-immediates.js:
+
 2012-12-27  Mike West  <[email protected]>
 
         Add context to the console message generated by Document::printNavigationErrorMessage.

Modified: trunk/LayoutTests/fast/js/script-tests/instance-of-immediates.js (138523 => 138524)


--- trunk/LayoutTests/fast/js/script-tests/instance-of-immediates.js	2012-12-28 07:44:35 UTC (rev 138523)
+++ trunk/LayoutTests/fast/js/script-tests/instance-of-immediates.js	2012-12-28 08:00:58 UTC (rev 138524)
@@ -12,29 +12,29 @@
     testMethod["obj"]("(obj instanceof " + constructor + ")");
 }
 
-// Test set 1, test passsing the integer 1 as the constructor to be tested for.
+// Test set 1, test passing the integer 1 as the constructor to be tested for.
 // The constructor being an object is the first thing tested, so these should all throw.
 testSet("1", { "1":shouldThrow, "{}":shouldThrow, "obj":shouldThrow });
 
-// Test set 2, test passsing an empty object ({}) as the constructor to be tested for.
+// Test set 2, test passing an empty object ({}) as the constructor to be tested for.
 // As well as being an object, the constructor must implement 'HasInstance' (i.e. be a function), so these should all throw too.
 testSet("{}", { "1":shouldThrow, "{}":shouldThrow, "obj":shouldThrow });
 
-// Test set 3, test passsing Constructor as the constructor to be tested for.
+// Test set 3, test passing Constructor as the constructor to be tested for.
 // Nothing should except, the third test should pass, since obj is an instance of Constructor.
 testSet("Constructor", { "1":shouldBeFalse, "{}":shouldBeFalse, "obj":shouldBeTrue });
 
-// Test set 4, test passsing Constructor as the constructor to be tested for - with Constructor.prototype set to the integer 1.
+// Test set 4, test passing Constructor as the constructor to be tested for - with Constructor.prototype set to the integer 1.
 // Constructor.prototype being a non-object will cause an exception, /unless/ value is also a non-object, since this is checked first.
 Constructor.prototype = 1;
 testSet("Constructor", { "1":shouldBeFalse, "{}":shouldThrow, "obj":shouldThrow });
 
-// Test set 5, test passsing Constructor as the constructor to be tested for - with Constructor.prototype set to an empty object ({}).
+// Test set 5, test passing Constructor as the constructor to be tested for - with Constructor.prototype set to an empty object ({}).
 // All test fail, no reason to throw.  (obj instanceof Constructor) is now false, since Constructor.prototype has changed.
 Constructor.prototype = {};
 testSet("Constructor", { "1":shouldBeFalse, "{}":shouldBeFalse, "obj":shouldBeFalse });
 
-// Test set 6, test passsing Constructor as the constructor to be tested for - with Constructor.prototype set to null.
+// Test set 6, test passing Constructor as the constructor to be tested for - with Constructor.prototype set to null.
 // Test that behaviour is the same as for test set 4.
 Constructor.prototype = null;
 testSet("Constructor", { "1":shouldBeFalse, "{}":shouldThrow, "obj":shouldThrow });
_______________________________________________
webkit-changes mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-changes

Reply via email to