On 8/7/07, Mitz Pettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 7, 2007, at 2:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - added performance test. With debug build on MBP this takes about 1.5s to > run. > > * fast/block/basic/stress-shallow-nested-expected.txt: Added. > * fast/block/basic/stress-shallow-nested.html: Added. > > (emphases mine). Nothing about that makes sense to me.
Are you objecting to testing performance regressions as part of the test suite in general or particular method here? I'm open to suggestions. It does not take long to run (300ms on release, 1.5s on debug MBP) so I thought it would be appropriate for automatic test. There are similar cases in the suite already. It needs to have non-zero execution time so that O(n^2) nature of the bug shows up in testable way. antti > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev > > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
