On Oct 6, 2008, at 10:56 PM, Bely wrote:
Thanks Dan!
But what fonts should I install on windows to run the tests and
where can I get them?
The initialize() function in WebKitTools/DumpRenderTree/win/
DumpRenderTree.cpp lists all of them, alongside other fonts (Ahem and
the WebKit* fonts) that are in the WebKit source tree. The Times
family alone would probably suffice for the majority of the tests. I
do not know how or even whether any or all of the required fonts are
available for installation on Windows.
-- Dan
Thanks!
-- Bely
发件人: Dan Bernstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
发送时间: 2008年10月7日 11:36
收件人: Bely
抄送: 'Mark Rowe'; webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
主题: Re: [webkit-dev] 答复: About the layout test result.
On Oct 6, 2008, at 7:55 PM, Bely wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your reply!
I am running the tests on windows, with cygwin installed. After
build it in VC8 using “debug”
configuration, I execute the tests by invoking run-webkit-tests in
cygwin console like:
./run-webkit-tests
First time it says WebKitGUID.lib is missing, I rename
WebKitGUID_debug.lib to WebKitGUID.lib,
And later it says WTF_debug.lib is missing, again I rename
WTF_debug.lib to WTF.lib, then I began to run the tests and
Got the result.
Is there anything wrong with my process?
Hi Bely,
Many layout tests’ results are
dependent on the fonts that are available on the system. When you
run the tests on Windows, the results for most tests are compared
against the expected results in LayoutTests/platform/mac, so it is
expected that the results will mismatch, because a typical
installation of Windows is missing many fonts that are available on
Mac OS X.
Thanks,
-- Dan
Thanks!
- Bely
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Mark Rowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
发送时间: 2008年10月7日 10:07
收件人: Bely
抄送: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
主题: Re: [webkit-dev] About the layout test result.
On 2008-10-05, at 23:16, Bely wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am new to webkit. Recently I run the layout test and got
> the following result :
> [table]
> Test Feature
> Total
> passed/ incorrect/timedout/crashed/stderr
> Pass rate
> Layout Testing
> 9085
> 4853
> 4198
> 15
> 5
> 14
> 53.4%
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [text]
> Total: 9085
> Passed: 4853
> Incorrect: 4198
> Timedout: 15
> Crashed: 5
> Stderr: 14
>
> Why the pass rate is so low? Is this result reasonable? Or I
> wrongly executed the test? Can someone help me?
Which platform did you run tests on? Which port of WebKit did you
use? The buildbot at <http://build.webkit.org/waterfall> shows that
WebKit on Mac is currently passing 100% of the regression tests.
Results for ports other than Mac and Windows are likely to be
significantly worse as the developers of other ports have not spent
much time focussing on passing the layout tests.
- Mark
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
