Darin, thanks for you help. I think we must implement the extra member for "function object" in my program architecture.
Maybe more work. Thanks again. -Xiong On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Darin Adler <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 14, 2009, at 7:53 PM, Xiong wrote: > > So,can we add a member for the "function object" to store the method >> name[here is "getValues"] in theoretical ? >> > > Yes, in theory you could do that. Although that’s not the typical pattern. > > And this also like the "JSObjectRef object" variable in the callback >> prototype,we can get the class name like this: >> >> toJS(object)->className().data() >> > > No, you can’t do that. Those three functions are part of the internals and > not part of the JavaScriptCore API. > > Instead, if you want to know if an object has a particular class you can > use JSValueIsObjectOfClass. > > -- Darin > >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
