On 2009-06-11, at 15:16, Ojan Vafai wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Ojan Vafai <o...@google.com> wrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Mark Rowe <mr...@apple.com> wrote:There are also concerns about access to the data store of the application, backup procedures, etc. Our existing servers are well understood in this regard. We've also found in the past that having services spread across different systems causes confusion when something goes wrong, for whatever reason, as it's not clear who to contact to address the problem.For what it's worth, we've had next to zero maintenance effort go into keeping rietveld running on appengine. As far as I know, it's been pretty much stable and problem free. But I don't actually maintain it, so I can't say that for sure. :)It seems to me that all the issues raised with using reitveld are solvable. Assuming you all are OK with doing this iteratively instead of needing all the issues to be resolved on day one, I think we can probably start taking concrete steps forward.
Given what has been said so far I'm still not clear why Rietvald is a better option than Review Board.
- Mark
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
