I should also note, that kudos to the Haiku folks, the patches have gotten better (and smaller!) even over the last 24 hours after a few rounds of r-'ing -eric
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Eric Seidel <e...@webkit.org> wrote: > I went through every patch in the queue again today (obviously others have > been looking too, thank you!). We're down to 29 now! Huzzah! > We're having quality control/patch-spam issues from WinCE, Haiku and > Gtk-bindings contributers at the moment. Hopefully those will resolve > themselves over time as the contributers get more up-to-speed on our > process. > > I encourage other reviewers to actively r- bad patches, and try and educate > the contributers instead of letting them rot in the queue. :) > > We also definitely need to fix our tools to make it impossible to post a > patch w/o a ChangeLog, and impossible to post a patch that doesn't pass > check-webkit-style. > > -eric > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Eric Seidel <e...@webkit.org> wrote: > >> We're down to 60 now. 84 when I started my crusade (shortly before >> sending the previous mail). >> https://bugs.webkit.org/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=review%3F >> >> A long way to go yet! I think I'm tuckered out for the evening. >> >> -eric >> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Eric Seidel <e...@webkit.org> wrote: >> >>> The queue is out of control again. :( >>> >>> https://bugs.webkit.org/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=review%3F >>> >>> I've tried. But I just can't bring it down alone. :( It's full of lots >>> of port and other fringe related patches. Many of which need to be r-'d. >>> >>> -eric >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
