On 28-Aug-09, at 9:26 AM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:14 PM, George Staikos <[email protected]>
wrote:
The development of Iris Browser for Windows CE has been suspended,
but we still plan to contribute to WebKit as a project and this
does not preclude working on code specific to a given port. I
think there is clearly enough interest in the Windows CE port to
keep it around, and the impact on the tree is really not that big.
The more intrusive changes that were done by Torch Mobile were
specific to certain classes of features, really. I see no reason
to pull it out.
I'm not opposed to leaving things in. I am curious as to the
future of certain specific features. For example, the WinCE port
as written had a lot of Image system changes, and while I don't
think they would have landed as-is, they were prompting discussion
about how to redesign some of the Image subsystem to accommodate
them. If we're still hoping to land these changes (in some form)
it imposes a different set of design constraints than if we're not.
Anyway, thanks for the reply.
I think we'd like to see those features go in. They're
generically useful. I don't necessarily disagree with refactoring of
it either.
--
George Staikos
Torch Mobile Inc.
http://www.torchmobile.com/
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
