On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Oliver Hunt <oli...@apple.com> wrote: > > > This is incorrect, from the bindings point of view the type here should be > "any", which in the JS bindings means ScriptValue. The actual serialisation > is by definition bindings dependent, be that JSC or ObjC. >
Certainly, from a WebIDL standpoint this is correct. I'm not certain that our current code generator will accept this (the JS bindings are quite flexible especially if we are talking about custom attributes, but my experience with the ObjC generated bindings are that you need to specify concrete classes in the .idl files or else you end up with type errors at compile time - this could obviously be changed). > > --Oliver > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
