Agreed. Running every r=? patch through such a build-service is insecure. However if Adam wishes to run it on his own hardware, I certainly have no objections to such. :)
-eric On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Mark Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2009-11-12, at 14:43, Adam Barth wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Mark Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 1) People are already confused about how to handle the recently-added >>> commit-queue flag. Adding an extra flag is going to increase the confusion. >> >> I chatted with Eric about how to solve this problem. One option is to >> just try every change that has review? and add a comment to the bug >> about success / failure. That minimizes the UI surface and avoids >> adding yet-another-flag. > > That doesn't seem to fit with your suggestion for how we deal with the risk > of running arbitrary code on the test machines. > > - Mark > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
