On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 5, 2010, at 10:21 AM, Adam Barth wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:42 AM, tonikitoo (Antonio Gomes) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Q) Why doesn't the EWS post a success message? I like positive >>>> re-enforcement. >>>> A) I'm worried about spamming bugs with too many happy status >>>> messages. If we have N ports with EWS bots, we don't want to have N >>>> happy status messages. Eric and I have some ideas for a more passive >>>> success indicator. Once things are running smoothly, we can share >>>> some mocks with the list. >>> >>> I particularly like not spamming bugzilla in case of successful >>> builds, and IMO the code-style bot should not post a message either in >>> case of no errors. >> >> I agree, but this behavior was specifically required by Maciej when we >> brought the bot online. > > s/required/requested/
Haha! I actually meant to type requested but my fingers typed required. Freudian slip? Adam _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
