According to that site, the package is available under: License :: OSI Approved :: MIT License
Is that compatible with being landed in the svn.webkit.org tree? Adam On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Dirk Pranke <[email protected]> wrote: > Autoinstall appears to be pretty flaky for me at the moment, and these > aren't the sort of scripts that can be flaky :) I'll install > simplejson into WebKitTools/simplejson as part of the patch and we can > clean it up once things are stable. > > -- Dirk > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Eric Seidel <[email protected]> wrote: >> Be aware, there are a couple known issues with our current autoinstall setup: >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33632 >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33365 >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Adam Barth <[email protected]> wrote: >>> This page makes it looks like we can just autoinstall simplejson: >>> >>> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/simplejson/ >>> >>> IMHO, that's better than checking it in. >>> >>> Adam >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Eric Seidel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> We also have webkitpy/autoinstall.py which knows how to download >>>> modules on-demand. This is useful in the case that you're using code >>>> with an incompatible license. >>>> >>>> see webkitpy/__init__.py for an example of how we pull in mechanize >>>> (which is a HUGE module, with a compatible license for most files, but >>>> includes a bit of code which is not compatible). >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:39 PM, David Levin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> So far, things have been put in place with other files (like the python >>>>> websockets code) but I think that is confusing for a number of reasons: >>>>> 1. The level of review needed varies imo between 3rd party code that is >>>>> being used vs new code added to wk. >>>>> 2. The style never seems to match what is done for the rest of WebKit. >>>>> 3. It becomes unclear how to update it because there aren't always good >>>>> concise instructions about this. >>>>> Personally, I'd much prefer a ThirdParty directory to check these things >>>>> into which we could use to help address these things. >>>>> dave >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Dirk Pranke <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm about to upload a patch that depends on third-party python code >>>>>> (simplejson). The patch is a bunch of scripts that'll live under >>>>>> WebKitTools/Scripts . Is there an appropriate place for the simplejson >>>>>> code? In the absence of a better location, I'll probably check it in >>>>>> under WebKitTools. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Dirk >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> webkit-dev mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> webkit-dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> webkit-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
