I will update the patches with BREW_MP tag. Thanks, Kwang Yul Seo
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 3:00 AM, David Levin <[email protected]> wrote: > Based on this, it sounds like all [BREW] patches should be r-'ed and > appropriate BREW_MP ones submitted? > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:23 PM, KwangYul Seo <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> [1] NDA >> >> I checked the issue with Qualcomm and drew two conclusions: >> 1) For BREW MP, we can open source our code without any limitation. >> 2) For BREW, it is not clear if we can open source our code or not due to >> the NDA with Qualcomm. Hosting and distributing the code can cause a >> potential problem. >> This situation is interesting because BREW and BREW MP shares most of the >> API. I should change the official port name to BREW MP. >> >> [2] DumpRenderTree >> We are actively working on DumpRenderTree, but it is not ready yet. We >> plan to open it next month. >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Eric Seidel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I don't feel like this question was ever answered. >>> >>> Folks seem to be moving forward with setting up infrastructure for a >>> real port (which is good), but at least this question still remains. >>> >>> Also, does the BREW port already have a DumpRenderTree implementation? >>> When should we expect such? >>> >>> -eric >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Holger Freyther <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > On Wednesday 13 January 2010 18:23:21 Darin Adler wrote: >>> >> Someone is porting WebKit to Qualcomm’s BREW. And there are many >>> >> patches >>> >> for that port; now a significant fraction of the unreviewed WebKit >>> >> patches. Who’s going to review these? Is this a one-time code drop or >>> >> is >>> >> there an intent to maintain this port ongoing? Does the test suite >>> >> work on >>> >> the BREW platform yet? Will someone maintain a buildbot? >>> >> >>> >> I won’t be reviewing these patches myself until I know the answers to >>> >> some >>> >> of those questions. >>> > >>> > Last time I checked one needs to have a contract with Qualcomm (NDA) to >>> > get >>> > information (header files, documentation) that is beyond marketing bla >>> > bla. >>> > >>> > I would be interested if we are allowed to host and distribute the >>> > sourcecode >>> > that has used information which is under a NDA. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > webkit-dev mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> webkit-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
