On Thu, March 4, 2010 at 5:35:08 PM, William Siegrist wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Chris Jerdonek wrote: > > > [Resending from correct address.] > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > > >> 4) If we have a smooth way to do it, then locally installing a newer Python > >> as part of the WebKit development process might be acceptable as a part of > >> the WebKit. After all, everyone developing on Windows has to install it. > > > > There is probably a smooth way. I used MacPorts on Snow Leopard to > > install Python 2.4. This worked fine for me, and MacPorts says they > > support Tiger: > > > > For the purposes of this discussion, can we assume this approach will > > work on Tiger and is acceptable (to install Python 2.5)? It would be > > good to know the highest Python version that can be installed on Tiger > > using MacPorts. > > Since I have a Tiger machine handy, I tested this and was able to build > python > 2.5.5 from MacPorts on a PowerPC. It takes a while, but it worked. I did not > try > python 2.6. I've installed python 2.6.4 using MacPorts on my PowerBook G4 running Tiger 10.4.11, and it's worked find with webkit-patch the one or two times I tried it. Dave _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
