On Apr 9, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Apr 9, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Cameron Zwarich <cwzwar...@webkit.org> wrote: >>> We seem to welcome pretty much any port that has an active maintainer. >> >> IMHO, that's a good thing. I wonder if we should "archive" ports that >> don't have an active maintainer (e.g., by moving them into a branch). > > I think that would be good, if there are any such ports (I am not sure there > are any on trunk currently that are totally unmaintained).
S60? http://trac.webkit.org/browser/S60 --Oliver > > Regards, > Maciej > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
