On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Timothy Hatcher <timo...@apple.com> wrote: > On Jul 9, 2010, at 3:38 AM, Alex Milowski wrote: > >> Being able to go around the commit queue means you can cheat. That >> seems like something that should be reserved for more severe problems >> where we know the process used by the commit queue will fail. > > That is not how I see it at all. And calling it "cheating" is quite offensive > to me. Just because I want control over when and how my patch is committed is > suddenly considered cheating?
Sorry, that wasn't meant to be offensive. It is going around a process. That said, not everyone has committed to using that process. So, you're right. It isn't "cheating". All I'm advocating is using the commit queue much more often. I don't have any control over when my code hits the trunk. Somehow, it all works out in the end. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev