On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Peter Beverloo <pe...@lvp-media.com> wrote:
> I decided to take this issue to the mailing lists before posting a > patch for such reasons. The Apple documentation which is referred > to[1] in that bug has been updated to use WebKit's own vendor prefix, > so I suspect the impact of removing -khtml- will be rather small. > After all, that regression happened about four years ago. > You'll hope. There was a incident about a year ago where MediaWiki had a work-around for a very old KHTML bug and we had to add a special work around for MediaWiki for the compatibility. (See https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28350). Later, we found that there are various websites that uses 3 years old or older copies of MediaWiki. I'm very afraid that the change you proposed will cause many problems like that. But don't take me wrong, I like your idea. I'm just saying we have to be extra careful. Best, Ryosuke
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev