Hi Sam, Did you see the reply I sent on this thread? There are actually decent reasons to rewrite the code into Python, to simplify and speed up the new-run-webkit-tests implementation. Given that, do you still object to the patch landing (since the work has already been done)?
-- Dirk On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Sam Weinig <sam.wei...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, I seemed to have missed this thread. Please do not rewrite scripts > just to rewrite them in a language you like. WebKit's dependency on Ruby is > here to stay. Just because python is common at Google does not make it > universal. > -Sam > > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:48 PM, TAMURA, Kent <tk...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >> Thanks. >> So porting PrettyPatch to Python will make good benefit and should have no >> drawbacks. I should go ahead. >> >> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 09:21, William Siegrist <wsiegr...@apple.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 31, 2010, at 4:43 PM, TAMURA, Kent wrote: >>> >>> > Can we run python scripts on bugs.webkit.org server? >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>> -Bill >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> TAMURA Kent >> Software Engineer, Google >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
