On 09/11/2010 05:57 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> Do we still believe this FIXME is accurate? If so, I have some time > next week to look at removing the dependency. There's a patch that > either recently landed or is about to land that furthers the use of > Frame by ResourceHandle, so I wanted to check with folks more broadly > about whether this is the right direction. (Note that I haven't > studied the code yet, so I'm not sure what would be required to remove > the dependency.) I'am afraid QtWebKit is using that for a layering violation. Each QWebPage (wrapper around WebCore::Page + FrameView) can have a separate network engine (QNetworkAccessManager) and we go from WebCore::Frame to WebKit to find out which engine to use. I wonder how/if we can migrate that to a bridge, but I am afraid we will still need to have some access to Document/Frame/Page. _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
