On 11.11.2010 18:06, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:

11.11.2010, в 00:59, Julian Reschke написал(а):

- once you start supporting the "title" attribute you might want to consider sharing 
code with Content-Disposition for processing I18Nized titles (see related Chromium change 
feature request and change list 
at<https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=57830>).

As far as the Chromium request goes, please consider feature parity with 
Safari. We've supported non-ASCII file names in Content-Disposition for a while 
now, and judging by the lack of bug reports, our approach[*] is sufficient for 
Web compatibility. The only issue I know is with GMail, which blocks Safari 
server-side, replacing non-ASCII characters with question marks.

Do you have information on how frequently it's used?

Judging from


<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-03.html#rfc.section.C.4>

it's not supported in IE, Opera, and Konqueror, so it's definitively not interoperable today (besides, it conflicts with the existing definitions for the header).

Having two sources of file name information in HTTP headers sounds like a very 
weird idea to me.>
> ...

It's the format that has been an IETF standard for a VERY long time.

If you have concerns with this format then you *really* should raise them in the IETF HTTPbis WG, which is revising the spec for Content-Disposition, and plans to submit it for publication soon (it's already past IETF Working Group Last Call).

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Reply via email to