Wouldn't that cause folks to see two copies of, e.g., WebCore in their file system? That seems confusing.
Adam On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Carl Lobo <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually what I was thinking was using externals to present the new tree > instead of moving stuff around. People with patches could still use the > current tree until their current patches are all ready and submitted. Folks > patching against the externals would automatically get them through the > regular svn update. After some transition time once everyone is settled > against the externals do the actual move. The tree may look a little messy > for a while though. > Regards, > Carl > > On 24 Dec 2010 23:39, "Adam Barth" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion. I'll read up on svn:externals. One thing > we were thinking about doing was teaching svn-apply how to merge the > patches automatically. That would help make the move less painful for > folks who have patches in flight. > > Adam > > > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Carl Lobo <[email protected]> wrote: >> Excuse me for interruptin... _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
