Looks ok. Usually we stay away from mentioning changes in or plans for specific 
WebKit-based browsers rather than WebKit itself on the blog, when possible, so 
I suggest replacing the last paragraph with a general encouragement to help 
find compatibility problems with these changes.

 - Maciej

On Mar 25, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Peter Kasting wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Peter Kasting <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've created a draft blog post at http://www.webkit.org/blog/?p=1580 about 
> the recent changes I and others have made to the UA string.  I'm interested 
> in any feedback you might have.
> 
> Note, since this is a draft, you need to log in to blog.webkit.org to see it 
> (creating an account is simple and free).  For those who haven't logged in or 
> don't wish to, here's the current fulltext.
> 
> PK
> 
> ---
> UA String Changes On WebKit Trunk
> Posted by Peter Kasting on Friday, March 25th, 2011 at 10:44 am
> Recently some changes to the UA string (tracked by 
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54556) have landed.  These changes 
> are designed to add UA string detail, remove redundancy, and increase 
> compatibility with Internet Explorer, and are happening in conjunction with 
> similar changes in Firefox 4 (which you can read about at 
> http://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/09/final-user-agent-string-for-firefox-4/).
> 
> Here’s a few sample pre-change UA strings:
>  Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, 
> like Gecko) Version/5.0.3 Safari/533.19.4
>  Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7; en-us) AppleWebKit/534.16+ 
> (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.3 Safari/533.19.4
> 
> Here’s some sample post-change UA strings:
>  Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) 
> Version/5.0.3 Safari/534.24
>  Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7; en-us) AppleWebKit/534.24 
> (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.3 Safari/534.24
> 
> In detail, the differences are as follows:
> 
> On Windows, the initial “Windows;” platform identifier has been removed.  
> This was redundant with the subsequent OS version identifier, and is more 
> compatible with Internet Explorer, whose UA string doesn’t have this initial 
> token.
> The “U” SSL encryption strength token has been removed.  This token dates 
> from more than a decade ago, when U.S. export laws limited the encryption 
> strength that could be built into software shipped to various other 
> countries; the valid values are ”U” (for “USA” 128-bit encryption support), 
> “I” (for “International” 40-bit encryption support), and “N“ (for “None”, no 
> encryption support).  These days, it’s unusual to ship without 128-bit SSL 
> support everywhere; ports can add “I” or “N” if necessary.
> On 64-bit versions of Windows, tokens have been added after the OS version.  
> 32-bit builds running on 64-bit Windows have added “WOW64“.  (”WOW64″ stands 
> for “Windows 32-bit On Windows 64-bit” and is the name Microsoft gives its 
> 32-bit compatibility subsystem.)  64-bit native builds use “Win64; x64” for 
> x64-based processors and “Win64; IA64” for Itanium systems.  These tokens are 
> useful for sites that need to provide download links for native executables, 
> and match what Internet Explorer uses.
> The locale has been removed.  Web authors who want to know what languages a 
> browser supports should use the HTTP Accept-Language header instead, which 
> can supply multiple locales.
> Windows CE builds should report the OS version slightly more accurately (e.g. 
> “Windows CE 5.1” instead of “Windows CE 5.x” or “Windows 5.1“).
> Google intends to ship Chrome 11 with these changes, assuming they don’t 
> cause major web compatibility problems, in order to get them into place as 
> soon as possible after the Firefox 4 and IE 9 launches, and is already 
> testing them in Chrome Dev and Beta channel builds.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Reply via email to