On Jun 29, 2011, at 7:14 AM, Alex Milowski wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Dirk Schulze <k...@webkit.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Am 29.06.2011 um 05:42 schrieb TAMURA, Kent:
>> 
>>> I'm a little negative of developing a new XML parser. I'm afraid that the 
>>> new parser introduces a lot of security/stability problems which existing 
>>> parsers already resolved.
>> 
>> I feel the same. Writing a new parser from scratch means introducing a lot 
>> of new security bugs, parsing errors and maybe bigger performance lost at 
>> the beginning. Speaking from the SVG side, we fail at least three tests on 
>> the W3C SVG Test Suite because of parsing bugs if libxml2 on MacOS. All of 
>> these bugs are fixed in later versions of libxml2. Updating libxml2 more 
>> often on MacOS would help a lot.
>> 
>> With the new parser we won't loose support XSLT and XLink support?
> 
> If we write our own XML parser, we'd still have to use libxml2 via the
> libxslt in the short term.  libxslt uses its own internal data
> structures for XML documents and does not have a way to interface our
> DOM implementation.  As such, you load documents via the libxslt's API
> for it to use.  There are several XSLT bugs the relate to
> serialization of the XML and error reporting due to this usage.
> 
> That does mean that we'd have one XML parser for loading documents
> (e.g. XHTML) and XMLHttpRequest and then another one for when we run
> XSLT.
> 
> There are other choices for XSLT engines.  XQuilla [1] has an almost
> complete XSLT 2 implementation with an API that allows bootstrapping
> both the DOM and parser usage.  I've been chatting with one of the
> developers about their API and integration issues with WebKit but I
> haven't actually tried to integrate it yet.
> 
> Another option is to use a javascript-based XSLT engine.  I recently
> saw some exceedingly impressive demonstrations of cross-compiled XSLT
> processors interacting with the browser at XML Prague [2].
> Personally, I like the idea of a javascript-based XSLT engine but that
> would be a departure from a native implementation and I wonder how
> that would work on all our supported platforms.

We could also write a new native XSLT engine down the line, since we have our 
own XPath code already. This would let us fix a lot of oddities and hacks with 
the way our libxslt-based XSLT support works.

Regards,
Maciej



_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Reply via email to