On Jul 5, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Ojan Vafai <o...@chromium.org> wrote: >> We could simplify the syntax somewhat to not require the "= PASS" at the >> end. We could also change the bug format to be actual links instead (e.g. >> webkit.org/b/12345 and crbug.com/12345). >> webkit.org/b/12345 : fast/canvas/canvastest.html >> You can also list multiple bug per line: >> webkit.org/b/12345 webkit.org/b/33333 : fast/canvas/canvasttest.html >> That seem OK?
I like the idea of using links for bugs. Then it's easy to look it up without having to manually translate it. You could even go nuts and include the http://. > > I'm not so much a fan of this change. It's more typing and I'm not > sure if it makes anything much easier for the user (maybe viewing in a > text editor that will automatically hyperlink the text, I guess). Using a bug URL should in theory require no typing, you just cut and paste it. Unfortunately the default display URL for bugs is longer than the format above (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12345 instead of http://webkit.org/b/12345) but I am sure we could fix that if we cared to. And yes, it's easier on the reader, because you can just cut & paste the bug URL instead of having to convert BUGWK12345 into something usable, even if not using a text editor that highlights links. And you can paste it into IRC or an email and it is usable to your reader, again without having to translate. Regards, Maciej _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
