Nm, Adam Barth already split the thread in a nicer name too. Folks can reply there. :)
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Eric Seidel <e...@webkit.org> wrote: > We've intentionally left that decision up to the ports. > > Mac has a stop-gap test_expectations.txt file, which depending on the > result of this discussion will likely be expanded, or removed: > http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/LayoutTests/platform/mac/test_expectations.txt > That exists solely to record tests which are flaky under NRWT but run > normally under ORWT, but can easily be replaced with Skipped entries > now that we've switched. > > Qt (as of 23 minutes ago) has a similar file: > http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/LayoutTests/platform/qt/test_expectations.txt > > -eric > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Adam Roben <aro...@apple.com> wrote: >> On Jul 6, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Adam Roben wrote: >> >>> Now that more and more ports are switching to NRWT, it would be great for >>> someone to explain what the best practices are for dealing with failing and >>> flaky tests. >> >> Two specific questions I have: >> >> 1) Are the ports that have switched to NRWT no longer using Skipped files? >> 2) Are the ports that have switched to NRWT now using test_expectations.txt >> files? >> >> But I'm interested in a more general overview, too. >> >> -Adam >> >> > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
