On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Xan Lopez <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Adam Roben <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Jul 6, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Adam Roben wrote: >> >>> Now that more and more ports are switching to NRWT, it would be great for >>> someone to explain what the best practices are for dealing with failing and >>> flaky tests. >> >> Two specific questions I have: >> >> 1) Are the ports that have switched to NRWT no longer using Skipped files? >> 2) Are the ports that have switched to NRWT now using test_expectations.txt >> files? > > GTK+ still uses Skipped. NWRT understands both (although you cannot > have both at the same time), but of course test_expectations.txt > allows much more flexibility. > >> >> But I'm interested in a more general overview, too. > > Same here. FWIW, the Chrome test_expectations.txt file has a lengthy > introductory comment with some guidelines. >
I was meaning to stuff all that on a web page and remove it from the chrome test_expectations.txt file (since it's awfully wordy to duplicate in each expectations file, and I think slightly out of date to boot). I'll try to draft up something shortly this afternoon. -- Dirk _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
