Ryosuke Niwa wrote: >>> Why do diverge? It seems like we should at least prefix the >>> attribute with webkit in the case spec changes in the future. > >> See above linked discussion for details. In the end we felt limiting >> the selector matching to the scope is more natural, and - with the >> proposed exception providued by :root and :scope - is more flexible. >> >> However, naming the attribute 'webkit-scoped' may certainly be a good >> idea. > > Yes, please use webkitscoped (no - since this is content attribute?).
The spec requests that vendor-specific attributes take names of the form "x-vendor-feature": http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/infrastructure.html#extensibility So x-webkit-scoped would be the way to go. Ted _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

